Not Pro-Pakistan, Not Pro-India; Only Pro-Bangladesh!

I have serious reservations about Bangladesh aligning itself as pro-Pakistan, pro-India, or pro any foreign power. Our loyalty should be to our own people, our own future, not to the agendas of others. We must rise above this outdated narrative of choosing sides and start focusing on breaking free from these legacy mindsets. It’s time to chart a future that’s truly our own.

Terrorism has no religion!

It’s heartbreaking to see religion being weaponized in conflicts between nations in the Indian subcontinent. We must stop using faith as a tool for fueling hostility or justifying rhetoric against one another. No one stands with terrorism — and it’s time we stopped letting religion be misused to divide us.

Peace, not Conflict!

Let’s not add fuel to the fire in an already volatile world. Let’s try to work with others, even if we don’t fundamentally agree. An antagonistic mentality and whataboutism won’t take us anywhere. Peace ✌️!

Accountability

 All injustices, illegal acts, unconstitutional moves, and lies will eventually come to an end. And when they do, we, the people will hold you accountable for every single one.

Regional Diplomacy

Although often instigated by its neighbor(s) Bangladesh must break free from the vicious cycle of rivalry. Constant bickering with neighbors is unsustainable and counterproductive in the long run. Instead of reacting tit-for-tat in every situation Bangladesh needs to adopt a more strategic, forward-looking approach to regional diplomacy. It’s time to be smarter, less reacting, more thinking ahead.

Election & Reforms (Bangladesh)

“We the People” absolutely want elections and the sooner, the better. But not if it means handing power back to another AL 2.0. The reforms aren’t delays; they are defenses. No election can be valid if it brings us back to a system of oppression. The people will not stand for that! #Bangladesh #ReformsFirst

Weaponizing religion

Religion is not the threat — it’s the propaganda machine of fascist regime who are weaponizing religion for politics only reveals their desperation, not righteousness. Stop using religion to justify hate and propaganda. We see through it.

Bangladesh Investment Summit 2025

 The Bangladesh Investment Summit is a smart and necessary move by the Interim Government (IG) — both in terms of optics and substance. In a post-July landscape focused on rebuilding and recharging the economy, setting an investment-friendly tone is not optional, it’s essential. Critics need to hold their fire — this summit was never about delivering miracles overnight. It’s about signaling stability and seriousness to the world unless the next so-called 'elected' party sabotages the groundwork like they’ve done time and time again, this could finally be a turning point. But history has shown — they excel at wrecking momentum the moment they grab power. #Bangladesh #bangladeshinvestmentsummit #BIDA

Checks and Balances

The absence of genuine checks and balances has emboldened the executive branch to act like a tyrant, while the legislative and judicial branches function as pseudo-institutions, lacking real authority.

Defending the Indefensible!

Sometimes, there’s just no defending the indefensible - no matter what side you’re on politically. Constantly twisting reality or refuting everything to suit your side not only shows a lack of integrity, but also undermines your credibility in the long run.

Ban vs Not Ban

Having election after adequate reform is equivalent to have similar effect of banning AL even though you don’t ban AL. Banning a party never works in democratic scenarios. Besides no one has the right to deny some 30-40% voting bloc have their say. Why not ban those killers and Hasina for life rather than denying voting rights of a certain bloc. If needed do a referendum on deciding whether majority of the population want AL to be banned from participating in the election.

Outright Ban on AL

Those calling for an outright ban on the Awami League should prioritize meaningful reforms instead. Only systemic changes can prevent AL—or any future legacy party like BNP, Jamaat, NCP, or JP—from becoming another authoritarian regime. Banning a party without reform is undemocratic and would harm Bangladesh’s global standing, especially when the UN has given grounds to prosecute Hasina.

Are we so naive as to invite chaos instead of shaping a positive post-July Revolution narrative? NCP, too, seems to be following the same self-serving path, showing signs that it may reject any electoral outcome not in its favor. This “my way or the highway” approach risks repeating the very cycle of authoritarianism we seek to break.

Palestine & Ukraine

I will always stand with a nation that defends itself against an illegitimate occupation and refuses to be bullied into accepting an unjustifiable farce of a deal in the name of peace.

Power & Morality

Power alone is not a reliable tool for social influence - morality holds far greater impact.

Volker Turk & UN Involvement

Volker Turk’s recent statement regarding the UN’s involvement in the July Movement suggested that the UN played a crucial role in prompting General Waqar to stand down, which significantly contributed to the success of the student-led movement. This has been propagated by BAL activists including Arafat. There’s also a growing narrative, particularly from pro-BNP circles, that this movement wouldn’t have been possible without UN intervention—largely influenced by the US, despite their denials. It is said that Waqar was pressured to stay out, and without a green light from the Army (following Waqar’s statement leak on August 3rd or 4th), the march toward Ganabhaban might not have happened. Interestingly, Asif initially called for the march on the 6th, but it was moved to the 5th after receiving approval. While this perspective doesn’t diminish the significance of the student movement, it does raise an important question: To what extent did UN intervention impact the success of the July Movement? Is there any parallels with Mike Benz’s USAID narrative, which suggests external influence in regime change?

Banning AL

I remain fundamentally opposed to banning AL from the election. However, I am concerned that the proposal for a "refined AL" was presented to political parties, including NCP, on March 11. The decision on a "reformed AL" should not be made unilaterally; it must be determined through consensus, with all relevant parties, including IG, in agreement. Furthermore, IG and other key stakeholders should have the final say on who constitutes the "refined AL." The involvement of the army in this matter is inappropriate, and any proposal originating from the cantonment is not acceptable.

BNP and Tarique Zia

Looks like Tareq Zia will not be back for now. Does it even look good that he will just show up during the election? Or did he sense that things might be a bit chaotic in next few days and may come once dust settles. His hesitation and being over cautious is kinda odd if he intends to lead his party. I think coming back earlier would be beneficial for him since he is out of the country for a long time. Rebranding needs connections with voters too.

USA

 I still see the USA as a land of immigrants, built on diversity and opportunity, rather than one defined by conquest or exploitation by plunderers! #USA

Bangladesh 2.0

 Bangladesh 2.0 is unapologetically pro-Bangladesh, championing the vision of the Interim Government (IG) without favoring BNP or any particular political entity. Its commitment lies solely with the nation’s progress and sovereignty. #Bangladesh

Patriotism

True patriotism is not defined by loud chest-thumping. Those who parade their patriotism while enabling oppression are nothing but imposters. The fascist regime in Bangladesh for last 15 years has never been committed to the nation's true independence; their focus has always been on establishing a state subservient to Indian influence. #Bangladesh #fascism